Atlantis, Real or a Myth?
The Legend of Atlantis and the Science of Geology explores with readers this age-old mystery with the rigor and professionalism of a trained geologist, bringing a fresh, analytical perspective to the debate.
Volume 1 is the first in a series of eight books comprising a scientific, and open-minded, analysis of the Atlantis Legend and a critical review of the science of geology. The question I seek to answer in this series is a simple either/or one. If the science of geology has everything right, then there is no possibility that the island continent of Atlantis ever existed in the North Atlantic or anywhere else. On the other hand, if it can be shown that the Atlantis Legend has a basis in reality, then the science of geology must be flawed in at least some respects. The first two volumes deal specifically with the legend itself, from both a mythological (volume 1) and scientific (volume 2) point of view. Volume 3 deals with Noah’s Flood, and Great Floods in general, while volume 4 examines ancient archaeology and the puzzles of megalithic construction at very early times. Volume 5 is devoted to the North Atlantic and the possibility, or otherwise, of a sunken landmass somewhere near its center. In this volume, I propose that, based on the evidence, there is every possibility that a landmass existed in the North Atlantic in the recent past. The remaining 3 volumes of the series are devoted to examining the science of geology and its many theories, and it is in the final volume that I present the evidence that ties everything together and offers a solution to the mystery of Atlantis, the Ice Age, and a few others besides. While I acknowledge this may seem a rather bold claim, considering what the science of geology maintains vis-a-vis Atlantis or any other legend, but, as a geologist myself, and very familiar with the theories of orthodox science (and their flaws) the claim I will make here is that these first two volumes of the series demonstrate that, at the very least, I have a valid case to make.
How much research did you undertake for this book and how much time did it take to put it all together?
This series was a multi-year effort, which began as a private study shortly after leaving a position as a professional geologist. As for this first volume, it began as a few introductory chapters to a geological study of the Atlantis question. However, due to nature and mass of material relevant to the mythological aspects of the subject, this book grew into a separate volume, as did volume 2, which is the original geological investigation. I would estimate that volume 1 required two to three years in total, involving research, writing, editing, rewriting, etc., and bearing in mind that other research and writing were ongoing at the same time.
What were some ideas that were important for you to share in this book?
By far the most important idea, and indeed, the core concept of this book, is that the Atlantis Legend might very well be based on fact, and not fantasy, as most consider it to be. With regard to the mention of “most” in the foregoing, there is still a small number of academics, of various kinds, that hesitate to dismiss the legend as simply fiction, and hold that there may be some truth behind it. As pointed out by many writers, Atlantis (and the Great Flood) are by no means the only legends we have of great destructions and floods and so forth, and such legends are essentially global in scope and extent. Further, many such myths include a geological component, and have, relatively recently, given rise to a new sub-field in geology, called geomythology, which is covered in the last few chapters of the book,and shows, via geological evidence, that many “geomyths” may very well be based in reality, and this goes for Atlantis as much as any other.
When will book two be available? Can you give us an idea of what mysteries that book will uncover for readers?
Book 2 is already available, published at the same time as book 1, both books comprising the two-part introduction to the series. Volume 2 is devoted entirely to Greece and the Aegean Sea area. The book begins with what the Atlantis Legend says about events on Greece at the same time as the destruction of Atlantis in the Atlantic. The old Egyptian priest, who first related the legend, describes the catastrophic effects suffered by Greece, and this volume is an examination of those effects and their extent. As everyone knows, Academic Geology does not entertain the idea of catastrophes such as that described for Atlantis. However, in this book, we will analyze the evidence on the ground in Greece and compare that evidence to orthodox geology’s uniformitarian explanation for it, to see if academia’s interpretations are sufficient. We will find that academia’s explanations are often seriously wanting and that a catastrophic origin is the only explanation for much of that evidence. This second book is, therefore, primarily geological, but every effort has been made to minimize jargon and make it easy to read and understand. After all, we’re dealing with the real world here, and most people are quite familiar with the topics covered.
I am currently working on book 3, which deals with the Great Flood of Noah, and others in Mesopotamia, as well as other floods of legend, science, and history. The book is about 80% complete and should be published within the next six months or so.
Author Links: GoodReads | X | Facebook | Website | Book Review
The academic establishment, governed as it is by gradualist uniformitarian geology, takes a dismissive view of Atlantis and all such catastrophe legends. In this series, and very much breaking with convention, this author takes an open-minded approach to the Atlantis question, and, for balance, a critical approach to the science of geology.
There is a very simple either/or question to be answered by this series: if modern geology has everything right, then the Atlantis legend is a myth with no basis. On the other hand, if the Atlantis legend can be shown to have validity, then this raises questions about the validity of the theories of orthodox geology—and vice versa.
The science of geology has had quite a varied history, and, as many people know, there was a time when notions of Atlantis, and catastrophes in general, were taken a good deal more seriously than they are today.
This book series, therefore, seeks to redress the inequality in the way Atlantis and geology have been officially treated. A thorough study of the Atlantis legend itself should give a sense of its reliability, or otherwise, while a critical analysis of geology should do the same for the so-called story of our planet.
This first volume focuses on the Atlantis legend from both geological and mythological points of view and includes a survey of classical and modern scholarly opinion of the legend, its language and structure, and its trustworthiness in light of what is known of Plato himself and his times.
Catastrophe and flood legends are prevalent the world over, and a general global survey of such legends is included. Further, in this study, a sampling of legends from the Pacific Northwest of the United States are discussed and analyzed through the new discipline of geomythology.
Because catastrophist geology has long since been rejected, there is no room in academia today for legends such as Atlantis and its catastrophic end. This series of books will show, however, that the natural history of this earth is quite possibly very different to what modern geologists claim it to be, and the fabled island of Atlantis may indeed be lying at the bottom of the Atlantic, right where Plato said it was.
Original source: https://literarytitan.com/2024/10/01/atlantis-real-or-a-myth/
Leave a Reply